Web Analytics
cryptonews
2025-06-18 10:46:04

Gemini Files Scathing Complaint Accusing CFTC of 7-Year ‘Lawfare’ Campaign

Crypto exchange Gemini has filed a complaint with the CFTC Inspector General, accusing the agency’s enforcement division of conducting a vindictive seven-year “ lawfare ” campaign prioritizing career advancement over legitimate regulation and consumer protection. NEW: Gemini has filed a scathing complaint against the @CFTC Enforcement Division, accusing it of waging a 7-year campaign of “lawfare” against the crypto exchange. Instead of going after real wrongdoers, Gemini says, the CFTC sued the exchange and relied on testimony from a… pic.twitter.com/ABWKaaH0j9 — Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) June 17, 2025 The 13-page complaint , filed on June 13 with Inspector General Christopher Skinner, alleges that enforcement lawyers “ selectively and unfairly weaponized ” federal law to bring “ dubious false statements charges ” against the Winklevoss twins’ exchange. Despite all these, the CTFC never produced evidence of intentional wrongdoing throughout seven years of investigation and discovery. Gemini Paid $5M Settlement to CTFC, Then Came After Falsehood The scathing allegations come just months after Gemini paid a $5 million settlement in January 2025 to resolve a case allegedly stemmed from a “ lie-riddled whistleblower submission by a discredited former employee ” seeking revenge after being terminated for facilitating fraud. GEMINI SETTLES WITH CFTC FOR $5M OVER 2017 BITCOIN FUTURES SCUFFLE So, Gemini’s taking a $5M hit to settle with the CFTC after some shady 2017 claims. The CFTC accused the Winklevoss-led platform of misrepresenting stuff when trying to get their bitcoin futures contract… pic.twitter.com/YS9yhaKudZ — Mario Nawfal’s Roundtable (@RoundtableSpace) January 6, 2025 The complaint names nine specific CFTC enforcement lawyers, including Manal Sultan, K. Brent Tomer, and David Oakland, accusing them of pursuing fabricated claims driven by “ selfish desire to advance their careers ” rather than principled law enforcement. Gemini argues that the entire investigation originated from false allegations made by former Chief Operating Officer Benjamin Small, who was fired in 2017 for his role in a $7.45 million rebate fraud scheme perpetrated by customers Hashtech LLC and Cardano Singapore. A 2022 arbitrator ruling found that Small “ fraudulently procured his employment ,” “ lied repeatedly about his experience ,” and made false statements in his whistleblower submission. Yet, the CFTC continued pursuing Gemini while taking no action against Small, who may now receive a $1.5 million whistleblower award. From Victim to Target: How a Fraud Case Became a Regulatory Nightmare The origins of Gemini’s regulatory ordeal date back to summer 2017, when the exchange fell victim to a sophisticated multi-million dollar rebate fraud orchestrated by two customers working in coordination with Benjamin Small, then the exchange’s Chief Operating Officer. Small was aware of the substantial losses but failed to stop the fraudulent trading and attempted to conceal the scheme from Gemini founders Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss. Upon discovery of the fraud, Small and other complicit employees were immediately terminated for cause, while Gemini successfully sued the perpetrators and recovered all improperly earned rebates totaling 388 bitcoin and $1.7 million. Rather than accepting responsibility for his role in the fraud, Small embarked on what he described as a vindictive campaign to “destroy” Gemini Trust, filing false whistleblower reports with the CFTC in late 2017. His allegations centered on claims that Gemini had omitted material information in statements to regulators regarding the exchange’s bitcoin auction pricing mechanism and its susceptibility to manipulation. The CFTC enforcement division “immediately and unquestioningly embraced” Small’s false claims, launching an investigation in early 2018 with what Gemini describes as a “predetermined outcome” to sue the exchange. Letter from J. Baughman to CFTC Inspector General Source: Eleanor Terrett More damning still, a 2022 JAMS arbitrator rendered a $5 million judgment against Small, delivering a “ scathing decision ” that found he had fraudulently obtained his employment, was terminated for gross negligence, and had lied repeatedly throughout his career. Regulatory Double Standards and Prosecutorial Misconduct Gemini’s complaint reveals disturbing selective enforcement where the CFTC ignored actual criminals while pursuing dubious charges against the exchange. Despite clear evidence of intentional fraud by Hashtech, Cardano, and co-conspirators, enforcement lawyers chose not to prosecute these wrongdoers, instead planning to use testimony from admitted criminals against Gemini. The enforcement division employed abusive litigation tactics, embracing an “ extraordinarily broad view ” of deliberative process privilege to deny Gemini access to potentially exculpatory evidence. This approach created what Acting Chairman Pham has warned against: a situation where defendants are “ presumed guilty with no way to prove innocence .” Crypto exchange Gemini is on the verge of obtaining a license in Malta, while Luxembourg is gearing up to grant a license to Coinbase, according to a report. #Coinbase #Gemini #MiCALicense https://t.co/WRQ1YhAMiG — Cryptonews.com (@cryptonews) June 16, 2025 The timing of the complaint proves particularly significant as it coincides with Gemini’s ambitious expansion plans, including a confidentially filed IPO registration with the SEC and reported progress toward securing a Malta license for pan-European operations under new EU crypto regulations. The post Gemini Files Scathing Complaint Accusing CFTC of 7-Year ‘Lawfare’ Campaign appeared first on Cryptonews .

Crypto Haber Bülteni Al
Feragatnameyi okuyun : Burada sunulan tüm içerikler web sitemiz, köprülü siteler, ilgili uygulamalar, forumlar, bloglar, sosyal medya hesapları ve diğer platformlar (“Site”), sadece üçüncü taraf kaynaklardan temin edilen genel bilgileriniz içindir. İçeriğimizle ilgili olarak, doğruluk ve güncellenmişlik dahil ancak bunlarla sınırlı olmamak üzere, hiçbir şekilde hiçbir garanti vermemekteyiz. Sağladığımız içeriğin hiçbir kısmı, herhangi bir amaç için özel bir güvene yönelik mali tavsiye, hukuki danışmanlık veya başka herhangi bir tavsiye formunu oluşturmaz. İçeriğimize herhangi bir kullanım veya güven, yalnızca kendi risk ve takdir yetkinizdedir. İçeriğinizi incelemeden önce kendi araştırmanızı yürütmeli, incelemeli, analiz etmeli ve doğrulamalısınız. Ticaret büyük kayıplara yol açabilecek yüksek riskli bir faaliyettir, bu nedenle herhangi bir karar vermeden önce mali danışmanınıza danışın. Sitemizde hiçbir içerik bir teklif veya teklif anlamına gelmez