Web Analytics
TimesTabloid
2025-08-30 15:15:14

Ripple CTO: Banks Are Too Slow for XRP

XRP’s relationship with traditional banking institutions has long been part of its story, but the focus may be shifting. Recent comments from Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer (CTO), David Schwartz, suggest that the company’s reliance on banks has diminished as new forms of liquidity take hold. The remarks were spotlighted by XRP Governor (@xrpgovernor), a well-known crypto proponent on X. According to XRP Governor, “Decentralized liquidity is here. The legacy system is cracking. A new financial era is underway.” MAJOR ALERT Ripple CTO declares: “$XRP no longer needs banks.” Decentralized liquidity is here. The legacy system is cracking. A new financial era is underway. pic.twitter.com/o5d3VIsxdR — XRP Governor (@xrpgovernor) August 29, 2025 Schwartz on Banks and Adoption In the video, Schwartz reflected on Ripple’s early approach, which prioritized partnerships with banks to gain credibility and visibility. He noted that in the beginning, securing agreements with banks appeared valuable because “a press release with a bank is a big thing.” However, Schwartz acknowledged that progress often stalled after the publicity, describing banks as “very slow movers” and “very conservative.” He explained that while banks offered prestige, they rarely accelerated adoption at the scale Ripple intended. He observed that financial institutions often avoided transferring the benefits of faster settlement and liquidity to their customers, as doing so would highlight inefficiencies in their own systems. According to him, this limited the usefulness of such partnerships for Ripple’s broader goals. Moving Toward Liquidity Without Banks The central takeaway from Schwartz’s comments is a recognition that XRP does not depend on banks to advance its use cases. He stated that Ripple has shifted its focus, moving away from pursuing deals that generate publicity but little practical value. Instead, the company aims to support real-world adoption and volume through mechanisms that bypass the constraints of traditional banking. By emphasizing decentralized liquidity, Schwartz pointed to a path where XRP facilitates transactions without requiring approval or participation from large, slow-moving institutions. For XRP holders and users, this represents an opportunity to see more activity driven by market needs rather than bank-led agreements. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 What’s Next for XRP? The comments reflect an important moment for Ripple and XRP. While Ripple has hundreds of partnerships with banks , Schwartz’s assessment shows that Ripple sees faster progress outside those agreements. The focus on decentralized liquidity suggests that XRP may achieve broader utility in areas where speed, efficiency, and global accessibility are more critical than institutional conservatism. For XRP supporters, this message is that growth is likely to come from new financial models that do not depend on legacy systems or institutions . Schwartz’s remarks indicate that the strategy has shifted decisively toward frameworks where banks are no longer central to success. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Ripple CTO: Banks Are Too Slow for XRP appeared first on Times Tabloid .

获取加密通讯
阅读免责声明 : 此处提供的所有内容我们的网站,超链接网站,相关应用程序,论坛,博客,社交媒体帐户和其他平台(“网站”)仅供您提供一般信息,从第三方采购。 我们不对与我们的内容有任何形式的保证,包括但不限于准确性和更新性。 我们提供的内容中没有任何内容构成财务建议,法律建议或任何其他形式的建议,以满足您对任何目的的特定依赖。 任何使用或依赖我们的内容完全由您自行承担风险和自由裁量权。 在依赖它们之前,您应该进行自己的研究,审查,分析和验证我们的内容。 交易是一项高风险的活动,可能导致重大损失,因此请在做出任何决定之前咨询您的财务顾问。 我们网站上的任何内容均不构成招揽或要约